I would guess that they think that they will escape liability, if Plaintiff is left without the central piece of evidence in this case. I ask this Court are they right? Are they going to escape righteous liability? Can Defendants assure Plaintiff that she can inspect and then hide the Things(s)?
August 13, 2008
Rhetorical Madness!!!
Also fun with commas! Reply to Opposition to Motion to Compel, served August 8, 2008: